Day 26

We resumed the morning staff meetings today. My lab partner and I finished sieving the last trial for our gravel sample. We also weighed all of oven-dried samples from our previous wet sievings. We then put the data in graphs so we could compare our data obtained from the different methods. The wet sieving data was generally accurate compared with the USDA standards. Our advisor added some slides to the background section in our presentation. He also moved all of our slides onto a new template with the CIS and GRIT lab logos. In the afternoon, our advisor went over our presentation again with us and explained a lot of the new facts and images that he added. He plans on combining a lot of our graphs into a single graph for comparison purposes tomorrow in addition to running our camera and microscopic images through the automated image analysis code on his computer.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Day 1

Today was the first day of my internship. We had a brief meeting in the morning and then went to get our ID's, computer accounts, and parking permits. After, Joe explained a team-building activity that we would be working on for the rest of the day: a scavenger hunt. All of us were given the same packet of objects/people that we needed to find around campus. In the end, we were tasked with making a movie that consisted of all the video footage we took of the different objects/people. At 4pm, Joe and two other judges evaluated our project and calculated the total points we received as a group. The scavenger hunt was a good way for us to get to know each other and discover more about the campus. Finally, before we went home, we each met with our advisors and learned more about what we would be doing throughout the course of the internship.
Read more

Day 20

My lab partner and I continued working on our PowerPoint in the morning. I took a picture of the clay & silt sample using the camera because our other one was not clear enough for the image analysis. I continued working on and finished the manual image analysis for the sand image and transferred the data onto a spreadsheet. However, after binning the data, we noticed that the particle size distribution did not match our data from the sieving trials for sand. We asked our advisor and he said to redo the image because the cropped version messed with the pixel sizing of the image. After lunch, I went to a MS thesis defense on visual perception. The title of the presentation was "A Tool for the Analysis of Human Interaction with Two-Dimensional Printed Imagery. I also started working on a new manual analysis of the sand image in ImageJ and finished before I left. Chris said that he will give us some advice on our presentations next Monday and after we can start the wet sieving if
Read more

Day 4

During the routine meeting this morning, Joe showed us two videos that featured RIT undergrad students in the Center for Imaging Science and their freshman projects. It was nice to hear what the students had to say about their college experience and their imaging science class in particular. After, Hannah and I went to go listen to a PhD defense seminar that our advisor told us about across the hall. The speaker was Sanghui Han and her presentation was titled "Spectral Image Utility Analysis Towards Optimization of System Design and Operation." She mainly talked about the comprehensive analysis of spectral image utility. It was very interesting to me that she drew inspiration for her research project from her experiences as a commander in the army earlier in life. Following the presentation, I went back to my lab (the GRIT lab) and read another article that I found online comparing dry sieving and laser diffraction (LD) techniques. In the paper, fine and medium-grained marine
Read more